Snapon Diagnostics Product Forums Diagnostic Home . Diagnostic Product Index . Customer Care        
Diagnostic SoftwareDiagnostic PlatformsAsk-a-Tech, Automotive Repair InformationTech Central
Go Back   Snapon Diagnostics Product Forums > Snap-on Diagnostic Products > Diagnostic Platforms > Verus User Forum
Home Today's Posts Register Members List FAQ
Thank you for visiting Snap-on Diagnostics Product Forums.
You are currently NOT logged in to a registered account. Some functions of Snap-on Diagnostics Product Forums will not be available to you if your are not logged in as a registered member. For a limited time only, registrationto Snap-on Diagnostics Product Forums to Snap-on Diagnostics Product Forums is !! FREE !! Select the    **REGISTER NOW**    link to register for your FREE Snap-on Diagnostics Product Forums account!!

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-23-2019, 01:04 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 252
Matt Congratulations!  Your peers have given you enough reputation to put you into the fist level!

Default CODE SCAN

I performed a Pre-Scan with my Verus Edge with 19.4 on a 2015 ford explorer. Pre-scan came back stating it analyzed 20 different systems, identified all 20 systems, and recorded any associated fault codes. Very comprehensive and giving me the impression all modules had been accessed. All was great until later I found out the air bag light was on and customer stated that it had illuminated off and on over the last few years. I attempted to communicate with the air bag module directly and found no communication as a result. Most likely internal air bag module fault. Why did the Pre-Scan report not indicate failed comm attempt with restraint module? The Pre-Scan report presented the list of systems that were successfully accessed as if it were the complete list of modules in the vehicle. I would like to see a flag raised during a code scan event if no communication was established with a specific module. I guess I don't read down through each list of pre-scanned systems making sure all modules are present and ask myself if I need to individually scan each one to ensure comms. Isn't the point of the code scan to consolidate all code retrieval attempts into one feature?
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Reminder: Your participation in these areas of the site is solely at your own risk. The
information is only the opinion of the poster, is no substitute for your own research,
and should not be relied upon for business critical decisions or any other purpose.
Never assume that you are anonymous and cannot be identified by your posts.
We reserve the right to discontinue any users' use of any such public forum
for any reason. Please read the Terms of Service.

Snap-on is a trademark, registered in the United States and other countries, of Snap-on Incorporated. Other marks are marks of their respective holders.
©2009 Snap-on Incorporated. All rights reserved.