Reflashing With The Same Calibration

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • greasybob
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1600

    #1

    Reflashing With The Same Calibration

    This question concerns flashing a module with the same calibration or part number it currently has because you suspect that there may be a problem with the software in the module and the module it'self is OK. The ACDelco tis will tell you that it does not recommend reflashing with an existing part number the FMP does some thing similar. The Tech Authority might let you down load but then it won't program. How do you go about erasing the current software so you can reload it ? Sorry, but I don't reflash every day so I'm alittle sketchy on the exact procedures, but always manage to find my way through to a successful upload when I get to the OEM site. The refashing with the same calibration has me kinda stumped.
  • Steve6911
    Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 2521

    #2
    Bob
    On a GM I just ignor the warning and keep going. I do this all the time when installing a used PCM to change the VIN# when the donor vehicle had the same cal.

    Steve

    Comment

    • Joe Rappa
      Snap-on DSD
      • Aug 2007
      • 2174

      #3
      You learn something new every day. That's good to know Steve. Thx!
      "You don't build a reputation on what you're going to do"
      Henry Ford

      Comment

      • millevo
        Snap-on D&I
        • Feb 2007
        • 3

        #4
        Chrysler reflash

        Bob
        on the Chrysler legacy application (2009 or older) the way the application knows to upload a cal file to the PCM is by reading the part number, so erasing the PCM to start fresh so to speak wouldn't help you. Chrysler's application does not allow the user to push a cal file down to a blank PCM like Ford's FMP.
        I have reflashed the same Chrysler PCM numerous times and each time I do this, the application gives me a pop up asking if I want to reflash the PCM with the same cal file with a YES button and a NO button.
        I know the application isn't giving you this option so you may want to check which part number the application is reading and make sure that is the same one you down loaded, if you don't have the right file in what ever directory it is looking in the application simply stops and says no update available or something to that affect.

        Comment

        • greasybob
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1600

          #5
          Thank's for the responses. I wasn't in a hurry to go against the commands and risk scrambling a module beyond repair. The only other thought that crossed my mind was to try and first flash it to a different VIN or calibration number and then reflash it to what I wanted. All that rewriting the memory can't be too good for it either. Have you ever fixed a problem by refreshing the calibration and not adding anything new to the program ?

          Comment

          • Orevin
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2010
            • 1110

            #6
            Originally posted by greasybob
            Thank's for the responses. I wasn't in a hurry to go against the commands and risk scrambling a module beyond repair. The only other thought that crossed my mind was to try and first flash it to a different VIN or calibration number and then reflash it to what I wanted. All that rewriting the memory can't be too good for it either. Have you ever fixed a problem by refreshing the calibration and not adding anything new to the program ?
            Some say the dreaded P0601 on Mopar products (Caravan and T&C in particular) can be fixed by a reflash. I tried a few times, but it never worked.
            -Kai-
            Chicago, IL

            Comment

            • Bob's Garage
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2007
              • 3312

              #7
              Overwriting same calibration numbers...

              Originally posted by greasybob
              Thank's for the responses. I wasn't in a hurry to go against the commands and risk scrambling a module beyond repair. The only other thought that crossed my mind was to try and first flash it to a different VIN or calibration number and then reflash it to what I wanted. All that rewriting the memory can't be too good for it either. Have you ever fixed a problem by refreshing the calibration and not adding anything new to the program ?
              I have fixed a 2004 Corvette that would not set readiness at all on any monitors with an "same calibration overwrite", I call it.

              After the reflash it set all monitors to ready within 20 minutes.


              I have also fixed a 2006 Mustang that would not set readiness on CAT, and O2 and O2 heater monitors.

              2006 Mustang GT Emissions 5th reject.jpg

              In this case however, there were no rear O2 signal PIDs, it did have rear O2 heater PIDs:

              20100830-1940-1.jpg

              20100901-1422-1.jpg

              20100901-1536-1.jpg



              When I went to reflash it, I got the message "you are attempting to reflash with the same cal" (not word for word): .

              20100827-1448-1.jpg

              I did a PMI anyhow and overwrote it.20100830-1028-1.jpg


              After reflash, Rear O2S signals have returned:

              20100901-1558-1.jpg


              In both cases, I feel that these were aftermarket calibrations designed to shut down monitors so that no codes would set. Overwritng them merely took it back to stock.

              The reason the calibrations have the same number I suspect is to hide it from the state EPA OBD testing and search for CVN numbers. Who knows.


              Mode $06 Before:

              20100830-1053-1.jpg

              Mode $06 after:

              20100901-1614-1.jpg

              So, overwriting calibrations can do some good:

              20100902-1315-5.jpg

              Bob
              Last edited by Bob's Garage; 09-04-2011, 11:47 AM.

              Comment

              • Bob's Garage
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2007
                • 3312

                #8
                Addition to reflash post on Mustang

                Oops, I had a couple of more slides....


                In the end after the reflash, the rear O2 PIDs returned. Remember the O2 data group from the Verus screenshot? There were only 22 PIDs.

                Here it is after the reflash, the rear O2 PIDS have returned along with 2 rear Heater CMD PIDs (boxed in red) There are now 26 PIDs:

                20100901-1759-2.jpg

                20100901-1803-1.jpg

                Oh Yeah, the Valuable Final Product! (now I can collect) :

                2006 Mustang GT emissions pass.jpg

                You can see the CAT monitor was not ready, but I had enough to pass.

                I can assure those reading this, that the CAT monitor did go ready later that day. The numbers looked real good in Mode$06:

                20100902-1318-1.jpg


                This Mustang was pretty stock, but, who knows what was done to it in the past?

                Thanks, Bob
                Last edited by Bob's Garage; 09-04-2011, 11:48 AM. Reason: Mispelling...

                Comment

                • diesel71
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 958

                  #9
                  bob,
                  On the ford diesels and i have done this on a few gas engines, you can choose module instalation. the fmp will then say install new module then click the tic mark. even though you didnt change it it will start the programing suit.

                  Comment

                  • Bob's Garage
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 3312

                    #10
                    PMI on the same module is an overwrite

                    "bob,
                    On the ford diesels and i have done this on a few gas engines, you can choose module instalation. the fmp will then say install new module then click the tic mark. even though you didn't change it it will start the programing suit."


                    Right, That is a PMI. Programmable Module Installation.

                    That's what I did to fix the Mustang and a similar process on the Corvette. GM says "we do not support reflashing with the same calibration" I understand. But I have cars to fix!!

                    Thanks, Bob

                    Comment

                    • USpMD
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 171

                      #11
                      jesue christ bob,,,,, do you sleep at night or just post, corvette or mustang, got yo be the most overwrighted programs out there, when you identified vehicle was ther any clues, ie; module unsuported? did you capturre the vin#
                      "I wanna help the helpless, but I could careless about the clueless". Dennis Miller

                      Comment

                      • USpMD
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 171

                        #12
                        I have to admit , I dont use my verus on Ford or GM, I use dealer tools only, ie IDS or GDS2, tech 2 win, in these cases they would advise you of modified programs(checksum error), in the aftermarket we dont get this advanced warning, to bad so sad (dealer lengo) we have to find out by trial and error, Bob, wher do you find the time for these videos???, between my business and teaching at the college, I just dont have the time, you do impress me
                        Last edited by USpMD; 09-24-2011, 07:03 AM.
                        "I wanna help the helpless, but I could careless about the clueless". Dennis Miller

                        Comment

                        • Bob's Garage
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2007
                          • 3312

                          #13
                          Re-re-programming for fun & profit

                          Originally posted by USpMD
                          "jesue christ bob,,,,, do you sleep at night or just post, corvette or mustang, got yo be the most overwrighted programs out there, when you identified vehicle was ther any clues, ie; module unsuported? did you capturre the vin#"
                          USpMD,

                          I gotta tell ya, I have been spending less time on these forums lately, most of the stuff I write is on the internal side for product testing. I occcasionally stick my head out here on the public side for a breath of fresh air. I too, own a shop, and I guess the economy has allowed us to put in a little more time testing. That's why it seems I don't sleep.

                          As far as the overwrites, it's just something I do when I feel that there is a logic issue. The Mustang and the Corvette are really the only two vehicles I have done that on with any true success. As far as the Mustang, I got the message that the calibration was the latest and no new calibration was available, I tried because I suspected an aftermarket calibration patch. IN other words I suspect that the aftermarket calibrations have to hide thier changes inside a full factory calibration. If not a red flag would come up when the state OBD testing lokked for, VIN, CVN and other clues that the calibration.

                          I almost forgot, I also did a 2003 or so F-150 Lightning that had the EGR system locked out, A reflash fixed that also. That one was also an IEPA readiness reject. It needed one more monitor, and in the end, I got them all, I think. So, that's 3 vehicles fixed with overwrites. The two Fords were done with Verus and IDS.

                          The Corvette was reflashed with the Tech 2 also gave a warning that GM does not support reflashing with the same calibration. A reflash fixed that one also.

                          Well, would you look at that! 11:30! I'm late for bed.

                          USpMD, what does that stand for?

                          Thanks, Bob

                          Last edited by Bob's Garage; 09-26-2011, 08:40 PM. Reason: spelin'

                          Comment

                          Working...