GM Evap Service Bay Test

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bob's Garage
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 3312

    #1

    GM Evap Service Bay Test

    Just the other day, We had a 2001 Buick Le Sabre in with an Evap code, and I was using the Verus, just dinking around with it. I had noticed there was no Evap Service Bay Test (ESBT)for this year. I know a little trick, from using Tech2's, always look a year or two back or forward. You may get lucky and be able to use that test.

    So, no problem, I told the Verus that this Le Sabre was a 2000 and sure enough, the 2000 supported a ESBT. Of course, the vehicle was too hot to run that test, so I couldn't. ECT must be below 158 F and sometimes even lower than that.

    Anyhow, it turns out that the Fuel filler neck was badly rusted and had to be replaced. After repairs, my tech decided to use the Tech2 to do the "Service Bay Evap Test" (SBET) which is what GM calls it. He could not find the test identifying it as a 2001, 2000, 1999, 0r 2002, so he gave up.

    This time I was able to use the Verus for the ESBT since it had cooled off, ran that test and it passed with no codes and set the Evap monitor to "ready".

    I think the deal was with the SBET on the Tech is that GM periodically removes the SBET from some vehicles and doesn't tell any body. I was told that it was for accuracy issues, mainly false fails, so be careful. Maybe at that point Snap-On had already adapted the test for 2000 Le Sabre?

    At any rate, here is the TSB where GM decided to eliminate the SBET on many 2000-2002 models:


    #02-06-04-014: SMU - Elimination of the Service Bay

    Test Procedure - (Mar 7, 2002)

    Subject: Elimination of the Service Bay Test Procedure

    Models: 2000-01 Buick Century, Regal

    2001 Buick LeSabre, Park Avenue, Park Avenue Ultra

    2000-01 Cadillac DeVille, Seville

    2000-02 Cadillac Eldorado

    2000-01 Chevrolet Impala, Monte Carlo,

    2001-02 Chevrolet Camaro, Venture

    2001 Oldsmobile Aurora, Intrigue

    2001-02 Oldsmobile Silhouette

    2001 Pontiac Bonneville, Grand Prix

    2001-02 Pontiac Firebird, Montana

    with 3.1, 3.4L, 3.5L, 3.8L, 4.0L or 4.6L Engine (VINs J, E, H, K, 1, C, Y, 9 --

    RPOs LG8, LA1, LX5, L36, L67, L47, LD8, L37)

    This bulletin is being issued to eliminate the Service Bay Test from the Service Information

    diagnostic procedures and it has also been disabled from the Tech 2 Scan Tool for the engine

    families listed above.

    This information has been updated within SI2000 for the 2000 through 2002 model years. If you

    are using a paper version of the Service Manuals listed above, please make a reference to this

    bulletin on the affected page.

    The technician is now instructed to use the verification procedure referenced in the Test Guidelines

    for Use of Essential Tool J 41413-200, Evaporative Emissions System Tester, in Corporate Bulletin

    Number 01-06-04-044.


    Notice, they never told why they eliminated the SBET. Again, be careful because it is possible to get a false fail or even a false pass if there is a small leak using the SBET on a car that GM eliminated the SBET on. Too bad they didn't fix that situation (too late?) and add it back to the Tech2, then of course Snap-on would adopt it also.

    Bob
  • Raddex
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 9

    #2
    Great Tech Info

    Thank you for great helpful info!!!

    Comment

    • Joe Rappa
      Snap-on DSD
      • Aug 2007
      • 2174

      #3
      Great post Bob. Very helpful.

      A word of caution on IDing the incorrect year. Non CAN vehicles can generally be mis-ID'd without trouble, but if you do that on a CAN vehicle you are asking for problems. I caution against it.

      I recommend IDing all CAN vehicles carefully.

      Joe
      "You don't build a reputation on what you're going to do"
      Henry Ford

      Comment

      • jemoore17
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 19

        #4
        Originally posted by Joe Rappa
        Great post Bob. Very helpful.

        A word of caution on IDing the incorrect year. Non CAN vehicles can generally be mis-ID'd without trouble, but if you do that on a CAN vehicle you are asking for problems. I caution against it.

        I recommend IDing all CAN vehicles carefully.

        Joe
        What could happen? Can it cause damage to our Snap-on scanners? If so, what kind of damage and how does that happen?

        Comment

        • Joe Rappa
          Snap-on DSD
          • Aug 2007
          • 2174

          #5
          What could happen if on a car if you interrupted the CAN Line?
          All kinds of stuff, right?

          You may put the car in anti-theft mode when the PCM and BCM stop talking (GM).
          All kinds of U**** Codes.
          You could smoke any proccessor on the CAN bus.
          You could smoke a personality key, or the scan module.

          The list doesn't stop there.

          This is also why you need to end comunication with the vehicle, and shut the key off before unplugging the DLC connector. Most of the time you will get away with it, but eventually it's going to bite you.

          Joe
          "You don't build a reputation on what you're going to do"
          Henry Ford

          Comment

          Working...